Electrical power does not equal cleaning performance. This widespread misconception pushed manufacturers to compete on Watts, spiralling towards ridiculous levels of more than 2 500 W!

All too often, owners of inefficient vacuum cleaners were simply throwing away money in hot air and noise, rather than dust suction and burdening their electricity bills. Hence the need to regulate this product group, re-establish performance on more rational grounds, and guide consumers towards the genuinely best performing models.

What’s the European Union doing?

Ecodesign and energy labelling regulations for vacuum cleaners were adopted in 2013, with staged caps on allowed electrical power entering into force in 2014 and 2017 (at 1,600 W and 900 W respectively), and new labelling classes A+, A++, and A+++ gradually added to the initial A-G scale. It is interesting to note that the electrical power as such is not mentioned on the energy label.

The impact of these requirements on the market, especially the power caps, has been significant. Electricity savings in the order of 20 TWh/year were expected by 2025, as much as the residential electricity consumption of Belgium.

However, one frustrated manufacturer (Dyson), decided to take the European Commission to court for contesting the way vacuum cleaners are tested, that is with their bag empty (to ensure better reproducibility of tests). This test condition is obviously not fully representative of real-life use but, more importantly for Dyson, it gave a supposed disadvantage to its bagless models. Although a recent study raises doubts on this claim, in 2018 the EU judiciary institutions, after a lengthy and tiresome process, decided to support the claim and cancel the energy labelling regulation.

Work started in 2018 to prepare a review of the ecodesign regulation, and a new energy labelling regulation (the latter was scheduled for revision anyhow). A review study was completed, and regulatory consultations are now expected.

What does the coolproducts campaign want?

  • An extension of the scope of the regulations to battery hand-held models and robot cleaners;

  • Further stages of caps on power consumption, as this is the most effective tool to reduce the energy consumption of this product group;

  • Stronger dust pick-up and retention requirements, to further boost performance;

  • More realistic test standards;

  • A simplification of the way the energy efficiency is rated;

  • More consideration for other environmental aspects, such as toxic components and better availability of replacement parts, in the form of ecodesign requirements and information on the energy label (e.g. repairability score).

Coolproducts technical input and position papers:

2019 – Vacuum cleaners: Comments on draft final report

2018 – Review study – Comments on Tasks 1-4

2017 – Partial review – Position on the review of the durability requirements

2011 – Comments on the draft Ecodesign and Energy Labelling measures for vacuum cleaners

 

COOLPRODUCTS COVERAGE

Build logo
Diariodigital logo
Daily Mail logo
economist logo
El Pais logo
La Stampa logo
les Echoes logo
Politiken logo
Spiegel logo
The telegraph logo
The Guardian logo
The Verge logo
motherboard logo
Le moniteur logo
Zeitung logo

EUROPEAN PARTNERS

EEB logo
ECOS logo
topten logo
FoEe logo
Clientearth logo
CAN logo
WWF logo
Inforse logo
Zero Waste Europe logo
EIA logo
EEB logo

NATIONAL
PARTNERS

Bound logo
Ecodes logo
greenalliance logo
Natuur logo
The Eco Conucyl logo
Quercus logo
Global 2000 logo
Legambiente logo
Zero logo
CLER logo
Les Amis logo
Hop logo

Supporters

ECF logo
Life logo

With the support of thr European Union (LIFE Programme and European COmmission). This work reflects the author's views and does not commit donors.